Prishtin\u00eb, 10 prill 2026 07:22<\/p>\n
Kan\u00eb kaluar 50 dit\u00eb prej kur gjyqtar\u00ebt e Dhomave t\u00eb Specializuara t\u00eb Hag\u00ebs jan\u00eb t\u00ebrhequr p\u00ebr t\u00eb kvuenduar rreth vendimit t\u00eb madh n\u00eb rastin e krer\u00ebve t\u00eb Ushtris\u00eb \u00c7lirimtare t\u00eb Kosov\u00ebs.<\/p>\n
Sipas Rregullores s\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Speciale, gjyqtar\u00ebt kan\u00eb koh\u00eb 90 dit\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb marr\u00eb vendimin. Kjo p\u00ebrve\u00e7se n\u00eb raste t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonshme, kur ata mund t\u00eb k\u00ebrkojn\u00eb edhe 60 dit\u00eb t\u00eb tjera.<\/p>\n
Prej 19 shkurtit kur ka p\u00ebrfunduar gjykimi, e deri m\u00eb sot (9 prill), jan\u00eb sakt\u00ebsisht 50 dit\u00eb. Pra, kan\u00eb mbetur edhe 40 dit\u00eb t\u00eb tjera q\u00eb gjyqtar\u00ebt ta marrin vendimin, raporton Nacionale.<\/p>\n
Sipas kalendarit, i bie q\u00eb data e fundit kur vendimi mund t\u00eb shpallet, n\u00eb rast se nuk shfryt\u00ebzohet ky 60-dit\u00ebshi, \u00ebsht\u00eb 19 maji.<\/p>\n
Deri m\u00eb tash, Gjykata Speciale ka b\u00ebr\u00eb t\u00eb ditur se nuk ka asnj\u00eb vendim q\u00eb tregon se gjyqtar\u00ebt kan\u00eb k\u00ebrkuar koh\u00eb shtes\u00eb. Pra, mbetet n\u00eb fuqi afati 90-ditor, m\u00eb sakt\u00eb, data e fundit 19 maj.<\/p>\n
\u201cSi\u00e7 e dini, Trupi Gjykues ka deri n\u00eb 90 dit\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb marr\u00eb nj\u00eb vendim dhe n\u00ebse i duhet m\u00eb shum\u00eb koh\u00eb, k\u00ebto 90 dit\u00eb mund t\u00eb zgjaten. Bazuar n\u00eb dosjet publike, aktualisht nuk ka asnj\u00eb vendim apo dosje tjet\u00ebr q\u00eb tregon n\u00ebse do t\u00eb k\u00ebrkohet koh\u00eb shtes\u00eb\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjigjen e Gjykat\u00ebs Speciale p\u00ebr Nacionalen.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb Rregulloren e Procedur\u00ebs dhe Provave t\u00eb Gjykat\u00ebs Speciale, jepen detaje se gjyqtar\u00ebt vendosin p\u00ebr secil\u00ebn akuz\u00eb ve\u00e7 e ve\u00e7.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb raste t\u00eb rralla kur atyre iu duhet koh\u00eb shtes\u00eb, mund ta p\u00ebrdorin edhe afatin prej 60-dit\u00ebsh shtes\u00eb.<\/p>\n
\u201cVendimi i gjykimit shqiptohet brenda n\u00ebnt\u00ebdhjet\u00eb (90) dit\u00ebsh pas mbylljes s\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtjes gjyq\u00ebsore sipas rregull\u00ebs 136, dhe n\u00eb t\u00eb mund t\u00eb p\u00ebrfshihet edhe nj\u00eb vendim sipas nenit 22(7) t\u00eb Ligjit. N\u00eb qoft\u00eb se rrethanat e \u00e7\u00ebshtjes k\u00ebrkojn\u00eb zgjatje t\u00eb m\u00ebtejshme t\u00eb afatit, kjo nuk shkon m\u00eb shum\u00eb se gjasht\u00ebdhjet\u00eb (60) dit\u00eb p\u00ebrve\u00e7se kur \u00ebsht\u00eb absolutisht e nevojshme. 3Vendimi p\u00ebr zgjatjen e afatit \u00ebsht\u00eb publik dhe pal\u00ebt e Mbrojt\u00ebsi i Viktimave informohen n\u00eb lidhje me t\u00eb. 4P\u00ebr zgjatjen e afatit jepen arsyet p\u00ebrkat\u00ebse\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb Rregullore.<\/p>\n
Pavar\u00ebsisht p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb procesit, Prokuroria e Hag\u00ebs ka d\u00ebrguar prova t\u00eb reja n\u00eb procedur\u00eb.<\/p>\n
P\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb u ankua mbrojtja e Hashim Tha\u00e7it, dhe gjyqtar\u00ebt vendos\u00ebn n\u00eb favor t\u00eb Prokuroris\u00eb.<\/p>\n
Sipas vendimit t\u00eb Speciales, Prokuroria ka dor\u00ebzuar materiale m\u00eb 4 dhe 10 mars, por q\u00eb sipas vendimit, nuk ka prova t\u00eb reja n\u00eb procedur\u00eb.<\/p>\n
\u201cPaneli v\u00ebren se Mbrojtja e Tha\u00e7it e ngre k\u00ebt\u00eb argument p\u00ebr her\u00eb t\u00eb par\u00eb n\u00eb P\u00ebrgjigjen e saj dhe, n\u00eb kund\u00ebrshtim me Rregullin 76, k\u00ebto argumente nuk adresojn\u00eb asnj\u00eb \u00e7\u00ebshtje t\u00eb ngritur nga PSP-ja n\u00eb P\u00ebrgjigje. Sidoqoft\u00eb, Paneli v\u00ebren se Rregulli 139 p\u00ebrcakton qart\u00eb cilat prova do t\u00eb shqyrtoj\u00eb Paneli p\u00ebr q\u00ebllimet e vendimit dhe si\u00e7 u tha nga Gjyqtari i Procedur\u00ebs Paraprake, nj\u00eb panel Gjyqtar\u00ebsh profesionist\u00eb mund t\u00eb vler\u00ebsoj\u00eb vet\u00ebm provat e pranuara para tij n\u00eb gjyq. N\u00ebse ato jan\u00eb, si\u00e7 pretendohet nga Mbrojtja, inkriminuese apo, si\u00e7 etiketohen nga PSP-ja, shfaj\u00ebsuese, \u00ebsht\u00eb pra e par\u00ebnd\u00ebsishme dhe Mbrojtja nuk ka arritur t\u00eb tregoj\u00eb ndonj\u00eb paragjykim q\u00eb do t\u00eb k\u00ebrkonte nj\u00eb leht\u00ebsim. Prandaj, k\u00ebto argumente hidhen posht\u00eb\u201d, thuhet n\u00eb vendim.<\/p>\n
\u201cP\u00ebr dallim nga parashtrimet e Mbrojtjes, Paneli gjen se dor\u00ebzimi nuk p\u00ebrb\u00ebn parashtrim apo prova drejtuar Panelit n\u00eb kuad\u00ebr t\u00eb k\u00ebtij Rregulli\u201d, thuhet m\u00eb tutje.<\/p>\n
Pavar\u00ebsisht p\u00ebrfundimit t\u00eb procedur\u00ebs, krer\u00ebt e U\u00c7K-s\u00eb po vazhdojn\u00eb t\u00eb mbahen n\u00eb paraburgim.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Prishtin\u00eb, 10 prill 2026 07:22 Kan\u00eb kaluar 50 dit\u00eb prej kur gjyqtar\u00ebt e Dhomave t\u00eb Specializuara t\u00eb Hag\u00ebs jan\u00eb t\u00ebrhequr p\u00ebr t\u00eb kvuenduar rreth vendimit<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":42402,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[60],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42401","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-shoqerore-sq"],"yoast_head":"\n